<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of Web Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.praj.com.au/the-state-of-web-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.praj.com.au/the-state-of-web-development/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://www.praj.com.au/the-state-of-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=261#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Another useful summary. Why bother doing all that research when someone else (you) has done it all for me? The limited amount of research I have done have pointed me towards a similar conclusion (Wordpress, JQuery and 960 where necessary). Hadn&#039;t looked into programming much which is odd considering that&#039;s my background (or perhaps it makes perfect sense).

That looks like a good article you&#039;ve linked to... but you&#039;re right. The list is pretty overwhelming. I guess there are some advantages to having been hanging around the web dev world for over a decade. It rules out a lot of the fluff for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another useful summary. Why bother doing all that research when someone else (you) has done it all for me? The limited amount of research I have done have pointed me towards a similar conclusion (Wordpress, JQuery and 960 where necessary). Hadn&#8217;t looked into programming much which is odd considering that&#8217;s my background (or perhaps it makes perfect sense).</p>
<p>That looks like a good article you&#8217;ve linked to&#8230; but you&#8217;re right. The list is pretty overwhelming. I guess there are some advantages to having been hanging around the web dev world for over a decade. It rules out a lot of the fluff for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.praj.com.au/the-state-of-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=261#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Nearly forgot - I do all my own CSS too.  Interestingly, something like 960 would have been VERY helpful at the beginning of my project! Might have to look into it for future use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly forgot &#8211; I do all my own CSS too.  Interestingly, something like 960 would have been VERY helpful at the beginning of my project! Might have to look into it for future use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.praj.com.au/the-state-of-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=261#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...Some interesting stuff here.  If I had have researched a bit more before I embarked on my web dev journey I probably would&#039;ve spent WAAAAAY less time learning PHP from scratch and some basic Javascript!  I&#039;m still writing my own PHP routines, but I use Prototype as a JS framework.  Perhaps it&#039;s my complete lack of formal training in programming, but it took me some time to get to grips with Prototype.  Still don&#039;t use it too much, mainly just for the AJAX-y bits on pages :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;Some interesting stuff here.  If I had have researched a bit more before I embarked on my web dev journey I probably would&#8217;ve spent WAAAAAY less time learning PHP from scratch and some basic Javascript!  I&#8217;m still writing my own PHP routines, but I use Prototype as a JS framework.  Perhaps it&#8217;s my complete lack of formal training in programming, but it took me some time to get to grips with Prototype.  Still don&#8217;t use it too much, mainly just for the AJAX-y bits on pages <img src='http://www.praj.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
